Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Type of study
Language
Year range
1.
Annals of Saudi Medicine. 2010; 30 (4): 317-320
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-105396

ABSTRACT

Reduction of giant hernia contents into the abdominal cavity may cause intraoperative and postoperative problems such as abdominal compartment syndrome. Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum expands the abdominal cavity, increases the patient's tolerability to operation, and can diminish intraoperative and postoperative complications. Preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum is recommended for giant ventral hernias, but rarely for giant inguinal hernias. We present two giant inguinal hernia patients who were prepared for hernia repair with preoperative progressive pneumoperitoneum and then treated successfully by graft hernioplasty. We observed that abdominal expansion correlated with the inflated volume and pressure during the first four days of pneumperitoneum. Although insufflated gas volume can be different among patients, we observed that the duration of insufflation may be the same for similar patients


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Preoperative Care , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Pneumoperitoneum, Artificial/methods , Postoperative Complications , Insufflation , Cicatrix
2.
Medical Principles and Practice. 2010; 19 (3): 211-215
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-98439

ABSTRACT

To investigate wound healing rates and postoperative recovery of patients after a one-time phenol application for pilonidal disease. A total 30 consecutive patients with chronic pilonidal disease ranging from midline to complex sinuses were enrolled in the study. No preoperative laboratory examinations or bowel preparation were required. No antibiotic prophylaxis or sedation was used. A small incision was made on the midline and hair/ debris in the sinuses was removed. A cotton swab with saturated phenol was moved into the cavity and the phenol was left for 2 min. No special dressing was necessary and patients left the hospital immediately afterwards. Patients filled out a daily questionnaire for 7 days. We did not intervene in the wounds with a second phenol application or curettage during the observation period. Wounds were inspected at weekly intervals for 2 months. At the end of the third day, 97% of the patients were pain-free and 100% of the patients were free from analgesics. Time off work was 2 days for most patients [93.3%]. Twenty-eight [93.3%] patients were satisfied with the procedure, they found it easy and painless and suggested the procedure to other patients. Twenty-five [83%] patients were asymptomatic at the end of 2 months' observation and the remaining 5 patients had un-healed sinuses. Mean time for wound healing was 25 days [range 10-63 days]. There were 4 recurrences after a mean of 14 months' follow-up and the overall success rate was 70%. A one-time phenol application was an effective treatment for pilonidal disease with acceptable wound healing rates, less postoperative pain and less time off work. Hence it can be an alternative treatment modality


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Phenol , Phenol/adverse effects , Wound Healing/drug effects , Sclerosing Solutions , Pain/chemically induced
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL